2014 KA Minutes of the Workshop

2nd Workshop CityGML EnergyADE - Karlsruhe, 30th of October 2014

• Host: EIFER Karlsruhe, Germany
• List of participants

Next Steps - TODO List

WHAT	WHO	WHEN
Provide Feedbacks on the current UML Schemas (see Community Portal)	ALL participants	Nov 2014
Finalize the ADE Energy UML Schema, based on the different Feedbacks	HFT (Bruse, Nouvel)	1st week Dec 2014
Write ADE Energy XSD Schema	EIFER (Nichersu), CSTB (Tournaire)	Dec 2014
Implement XSD Schema in Simulation tool/platform Write test CityGML file	RWTH Aachen, EPFL, SINERGIS, CSTB, TUM, HFT	Jan - Feb 2015
Start simulation based on test CityGML file Iterative process with feedbacks	RWTH Aachen, EPFL, SINERGIS, CSTB, TUM, HFT	Mar - Apr 2015
Come to next workshop with results	ALL participants	Mar - Apr 2015

Presentations

Presenters (Organisation)	Presentations
Jean-Marie Bahu ( EIFER Karlsruhe )	Energy ADE Workshop - Introduction
Dr. Gerhard Gröger ( Univ of Bonn - Geoinformatics)	Energy Aspects of the INSPIRE Building Model
Dr. Joachim Benner, Karl-Heinz Häfele (KIT Karlsruhe)	Proposal of a Material Extension for the EnergyADE
Romain Nouvel ( HFT Stuttgart )	Report of the Activities of the Building Physics Group
Romain Nouvel ( HFT Stuttgart )	Report of the Activities of the Energy Systems Group
Jean-Marie Bahu ( EIFER Karlsruhe )	Report of the Activities of the Building Occupants Group
Volker Kraut ( M.O.S.S. Taufkirchen )	Report of the Activities of the Metadata Group

Discussions

Energy Aspects of the INSPIRE Building Model - Dr. Gerhard Gröger Overlapping risks between ADE INSPIRE and ADE ENERGY R. Nouvel: is there some risks of redundancy between the ADE INSPIRE developped currently (in particular by Mr. Kolbe) and our ADE ENERGY? >>> J. Benner: There is no semantic or low-level semantic overlap between them.

... - Joachim Benner Specific Window Object K.H. Haefele: Window may be considered as a generic construction. Is an additional window model required? >>> M. Launer: For dynamic energy simulation, a specific window model, including window shading and window opening is actually needed. Consideration of costs K.H. Haefele: Should be “cost” taken into account in UML? How it should be integrated? (All costs are here considering, including financial costs, grey energy, emission cost needed etc.) >>> R. Nouvel: Cost information is not specific to materials. Therefore it should not be part of the material ADE. Maybe later a Costs ADE could be developed M. Petit: in costs, currency and unit parameters could be combined in a unique parameters. Consideration of indoor air quality Same consideration that for costs. This is not specific to materials. Material texture / visualization K.H. Haefele: there are some risks that the texture displays in an uncorrect orientation. Should we add an explicit visualization information? Material Thickness R Nouvel: In the current ADE Materials version of KIT (like in gbXML), Thickness is part of the material parameters. In most simulation models and some international formats (ifc), thickness is associated with layers while materials contain only parameters proper to it (conductivity, volumetric capacity etc.). Could we rather consider this modelling way.