2016 FE Minutes of the Workshop: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 18: Line 18:
| Further work on the Best Practice document (Guidelines) and update it according to the changes of the Energy ADE 0.8 || Before next workshop ||  All partners
| Further work on the Best Practice document (Guidelines) and update it according to the changes of the Energy ADE 0.8 || Before next workshop ||  All partners
|-
|-
 
| Use available open city model (see CityGML wiki) and integrate into it probabilistic attributes according with the Energy ADE Scheme || Before next workshop ||  CSTB
|-
| Investigate  if the "external codelists" concept of CityGML solves the issue  || Before next workshop ||  Sinergis
|-
| WG Temporal time data: make a proposal, test it with real data and organise a conf-call to discuss about it  || January ||  Kanischk and Alexandru
|-
| Send working documents of INSPIRE extended Building Schemas || Before next workshop ||  JRC
|-
|}
|}
<br/>
<br/>
== Notes ==
* '''Best practice document''' - It is a document essential to raise awareness, in particular showing interoperabilities issues and examples. It does not need to cover everything, and may just cover the parts where we already have done real tests (real practices). Documentation should include: application, test case, test data, proof that it works in at least two systems. The UML diagram of the Energy ADE is the other output. Volker mentions that the XSD implementation may be also provided, but as an example of possible implementations.
* '''More examples to test''' - Pascal: We need more complex datasets available as examples to test the Energy ADE. How to press the case that CityGML-EnergyADE will be actually used widely as interchange format?
** Volker: datasets from some cities in Germany are already available, but just geometries with very few attributes (Building function)
** Elisa Colleague: We can generate probabilistic attribute values for some examples of the Energy ADE. One thermal zone per building. We’ve already done that for other ADEs
* '''Licence during the development''' - Apache protects also the name "Energy ADE"
** Olivier: Why don't we use the CityGML licence?
** Volker: CityGML is OGC licence
** Giorgio: Also 3DCityDB is Apache
VOTE: group has chosen Apache licence with a statement that after a certain version the license will be transferred to OGC.
* WG Energy Use and System: CSTB would like to discuss about a proposition of WG energy system structure (on Github)
* INSPIRE Extended Buildings model: development of modules Extended Building model of INSPIRE is still ongoing (and not a present priority). Giacomo is active in this Working Group and will bridge with our interests.


== Presentations and Minutes ==
== Presentations and Minutes ==