2017 GR Minutes of the Workshop: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Updated with more slides |
upadteing description |
||
| Line 156: | Line 156: | ||
<b>[mailto:Giorgio.Agugiaro@ait.ac.at Giorgio Agugiaro]</b> (AIT)<br/> | <b>[mailto:Giorgio.Agugiaro@ait.ac.at Giorgio Agugiaro]</b> (AIT)<br/> | ||
<i>Presentation:</i> [[media:20170523_Agugiaro_Energy_ADE_Workshop_7_3DCityDB.pdf| PDF file]] of the slides<br/> | <i>Presentation:</i> [[media:20170523_Agugiaro_Energy_ADE_Workshop_7_3DCityDB.pdf| PDF file]] of the slides<br/> | ||
* Growing demand for an ADE-aware DB solution | |||
* Design criteria | |||
* Implementation steps | |||
|- | |- | ||
| Line 163: | Line 166: | ||
<b>[mailto:kanishk.chaturvedi@tum.de Kanishk Chaturvedi]</b> (TUM)<br/> | <b>[mailto:kanishk.chaturvedi@tum.de Kanishk Chaturvedi]</b> (TUM)<br/> | ||
<i>Presentation:</i> [[media:Dynamizer_Kanishk_Chaturvedi.pdf| PDF file]] of the slides<br/> | <i>Presentation:</i> [[media:Dynamizer_Kanishk_Chaturvedi.pdf| PDF file]] of the slides<br/> | ||
* “Mini Sensor Observation Service” (mini SOS): lightweight service | |||
** work with arbitrary tabular data source (including ADE Dynamizer) | |||
** provide multiple interfaces | |||
* -> explicit link to Sensor | |||
** “getSensorObservation” | |||
|- | |- | ||
| Line 170: | Line 178: | ||
<b>[mailto:pascal.schetelat@cstb.fr Pascal Schetelat]</b> (CSTB)<br/> | <b>[mailto:pascal.schetelat@cstb.fr Pascal Schetelat]</b> (CSTB)<br/> | ||
<i>Presentation:</i> [[media:2017_05_22_ADE_testing_automation.pdf| PDF file]] of the slides<br/> | <i>Presentation:</i> [[media:2017_05_22_ADE_testing_automation.pdf| PDF file]] of the slides<br/> | ||
Motivation: ensure coherence in the GitHub repository (UML file, guidelines, sample files, 3DCityDB SQL schema) | |||
* Testing what can be automated : | |||
* Test sample files against latest energy.xsd schema implemented on the GitHub repository | |||
* For all WG: create sample files with explicit names so they can be both tested and integrated into the guidelines | |||
* Schematron compliance | |||
** Works in principle, but little practical impact because very simple | |||
** More useful would be geometric checking… but this would need a geometric module | |||
* Generation of 3DCityDB SQL schema? -> Not yet | |||
* 3D Validation : can City Dr be used ? | |||
* Class generation for different languages? -> Interests in Java and Python | |||
|- | |- | ||
| Line 175: | Line 193: | ||
==== Feedback on Energy ADE application in simulation tools (Joachim – KIT and Jérôme – Kaemco) ==== | ==== Feedback on Energy ADE application in simulation tools (Joachim – KIT and Jérôme – Kaemco) ==== | ||
<b>[mailto:joachim.benner@kit.edu Joachim | <b>[mailto:joachim.benner@kit.edu Joachim – KIT and Jérôme – Kaemco ]</b> (KIT / Kaemco)<br/> | ||
<i>Presentation:</i> [[media:KIT-EnergySimulation-Workflow.pdf| PDF file]] of the slides<br/> | <i>Presentation:</i> [[media:KIT-EnergySimulation-Workflow.pdf| PDF file]] of the slides<br/> | ||
* GUI for manual enrichment of CityGML files | |||
* Use of CityGML LoD2: compromise between availability and functionality | |||
|- | |- | ||