2014 KA Minutes of the Workshop: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 130: | Line 130: | ||
[[File:ADE_Energy_Structure.bmp|right|300px|ADE_Energy_Structure]] | [[File:ADE_Energy_Structure.bmp|right|300px|ADE_Energy_Structure]] | ||
Three different forms of ADE Energy implementation were brought up: | Three different forms of ADE Energy implementation were brought up: | ||
# a uniform ADE Energy, integrating all developments of the WG | |||
# a mandatory ADE Energy core on one side, and on the other side an optional extended ADE Energy (inspired from the Core3D and Extended3D from INSPIRE) | |||
# an ADE Energy core linked to several ADE Energy modules corresponding to different attributes categories (i.e. time-series, material, occupancy and energy systems). | |||
The last scenario was accepted. The ADE Energy core | The last scenario was accepted. The ADE Energy core corresponds to the Building Physics Module, which sets a data structure to link the different modules. The ADE Energy modules will be integrated in the same UML schema ADE Energy, in a modular way. Extensions of each of this module outside the "Building Energy" topic will be still later possible (e.g. creation of a ADE Materials or ADE Occupancy). | ||
* Levels of Detail covered by the ADE Energy | * Levels of Detail covered by the ADE Energy | ||
J.M. Bahu prefered to focus first on the main application of this ADE Energy: the building modelled in LoD2.<br/> | J.M. Bahu prefered to focus first on the main application of this ADE Energy: the building modelled in LoD2.<br/> | ||
R. Nouvel reported that the ADE Energy has been from the beginning developed as flexible as possible, potentially compatible with all CityGML Levels of Details (LoD1 to LoD4). Then he suggested to define a UML schema covering all LoDs, and | R. Nouvel reported that the ADE Energy has been from the beginning developed as flexible as possible, potentially compatible with all CityGML Levels of Details (LoD1 to LoD4). Then he suggested to define a UML schema covering all LoDs, and see the different feebacks during the test phase.<br/> | ||
This last proposition found finally consensus. | This last proposition found finally consensus. | ||